Microsoft beta madness

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

Talk about confusing… the long overdue Windows Vista beta 2 (not a community technology preview but a real beta release) has widely been expected to ship this week and yesterday, Bill Gates announced that beta 2 versions of Windows Vista, Windows Server (codenamed Longhorn) and Office 2007 are available.

The betas are ready! Office

Indeed, late last night I received an e-mail inviting me to download beta 2 of Office 2007 but strangely it said that “The Windows Vista Beta is not yet available. The Beta Experience newsletter will inform you about the availability of the Windows Vista Beta”. Vista beta 2 (build 5384) is clearly available for download from Microsoft Connect but, as usual, the product groups don’t seem to be talking to one another.

The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

A couple of weeks back, I wrote about Microsoft Office 2007, including the new OpenXML file format. In a recent Windows IT Pro magazine network WinInfo Daily Update, Paul Thurrott reported that the competing OpenDocument Foundation has announced a plug-in for Microsoft Office that will let users open and save documents natively in the open-source OpenDocument format (ODF), which has recently been standardised and is supported by IBM and Sun Microsystems. The plug-in, which has been in development for about a year, makes OpenDocument documents seem as if they’re native to Office. Add Adobe’s portable document format (PDF) and Microsoft’s XML paper specification (XPS – formerly codenamed Metro) into the mix and we have plenty of scope for document confusion.

Both OpenXML and ODF are open standards that are freely licensed but it remains to see whether either will become dominant. I have a feeling that we’ll have competing XML-based document standards to grapple with for many years to come.

Looking forward to the 2007 Microsoft Office System

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

Microsoft Office

I think I’ve been attending too many Microsoft events recently. Not only do the presenters know me personally, but I’m not hearing much that’s new. To be fair to Microsoft, that’s because two of the biggest product launches this year will be Windows Vista (for which I’m a beta tester) and Exchange Server 2007 (for which I was extremely fortunate to spend two days learning about in depth last month). There are many other products planned for launch in 2007 but those two are the ones that will mean most to me. I spent yesterday at the Microsoft Technical Roadshow – an event that I’ve enjoyed in previous years (although the multiple-track format has been dropped this year due to budget restrictions) – and even though much I’d seen much of the content at previous events, I was particularly impressed with Paul Brombley’s session on the 2007 Microsoft Office System (Office 2007 – formerly codenamed Office 12).

I’ve not done anything with the new version of Office (and can’t think of much that I do with Office 2003 that I didn’t already do with XP, 2000, 97 or even 95 – except that 95 didn’t have Outlook and that I could do more with 2003 if my employer made better use of SharePoint products and technologies) but I had heard of the new ribbon user interface.

Now maybe my comments about a lack of new features in recent Office versions were slightly disingenuous – the new features are there but it probably means that I still work in the same way I did in 1995. Whatever my thoughts are on Office 2003, what I saw and heard yesterday has inspired me to install the latest Office 2007 beta, if only to look more closely at the following features (which are just the ones that grabbed my attention – there are many more too):

In Outlook:

  • A new To-Do bar, which brings much of the old Outlook Today functionality into a sidebar, including upcoming appointments, tasks, and flagged items.
  • RSS integration.
  • Enhanced calendaring functionality (e.g. the ability to overlay multiple calendars – not many of my colleagues maintain their Exchange calendars, but I do keep separate work and personal diaries).
  • Tasks linked integrated with the calendar and assigned a time of day (including those from Project Server).
  • Improved search including query hit highlighting.

In PowerPoint:

  • Server-based slide libraries that can be tagged for use by others and alerts issued if updated versions of the slides are available.

In Word:

  • A mini-bar (I do hope Microsoft changes that name), close to highlighted text, that provides shortcuts to common actions (e.g. increase font size).

In Excel:

  • A zoom slider on the bottom right of the main working area.
  • The ability to publish parts of a report and therefore protect the calculations.
  • Fast table formatting with automatically selected data, alternate shaded lines, frozen frames on the column names and auto-filters.
  • Simple pivot table creation with enhanced conditional formatting and data bars on values.

The new ribbon interface (or, as Microsoft like to refer to it, the “results-oriented user interface”), which provides:

  • Context-sensitive links to commands, expanding and contracting the visible functionality in accordance with window size.
  • A preview of the effects of a command before it is issued (saving many undo commands), e.g. when applying a new style.
  • The ability to insert a new section (e.g. a cover page) from a gallery as a single command.
  • A new graphics engine, which makes it easy to add and edit attractive graphics with impact (not clip-art).

Other changes include:

  • FrontPage is now called SharePoint Designer (possibly reflecting the fact that it’s useless for designing standards-compliant web pages for use on any other platform).
  • Support for Windows Workflow Foundation services to provide document approval workflow.
  • Integration with InfoPath forms to capture metadata as part of the document authoring process as well as InfoPath in a browser (and not just Internet Explorer) and within Outlook (e.g. as a custom form).
  • Windows SharePoint Services (WSS) integration:
    • The ability to create basic Gantt charts in WSS using a webpart and link back to Project Server.
    • Document repositories with records management.
    • The ability to publish Excel data in WSS and view it in a web browser, natively within Excel, or programmatically within a custom application.
    • Dashboards, personal report centres and enterprise-wide searches for business intelligence.
  • Integrated communications (i.e. Office Communicator).

Apart from the new interface, probably the most significant change is the new OpenXML document format. Despite being proposed as a royalty-free, open standard, OpenXML has been criticised by supporters of the competing open-source open document format (ODF). Compact and robust, the format is actually zipped XML, so can be easily integrated with many business applications. Microsoft will continue to support the binary formats but OpenXML is the way forwards, with migration tools for the new formats as well as free add-ins for Office 2000, 2002 (XP) and 2003 to allow legacy Office versions to use OpenXML files.Microsoft is currently predicting an October 2006 release date for Office 2007. That means that although volume licensing customers will be able to get hold of it sooner, general availability will be in early 2007. Initially available as a 32-bit product, there will be a 64-bit edition later (64-bit adoption on the desktop is still lagging behind servers). In the meantime, there’s a 2007 Microsoft Office system preview website with more information including a comparison between the various product suites.

Office 12 has a name… it’s Office 2007

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

Whilst the Windows product group seems to have dumped year-based product naming in favour of monikers like XP (for eXPerience) and Vista (because of the views) it has been announced that the next version of Office, with it’s new “ribbon” interface, is to be called plain old Office 2007. Actually, that doesn’t bother me at all – as a corporate user, it tells me that it is most likely to be released late in 2006, and that because it doesn’t have a consumer-focused name it might actually include some new features for business.

As a Consultant, I’m also glad that Windows and Office no longer share a name (e.g. Windows 2000 and Office 2000, or Windows XP and Office XP) – it confused people. IT management generally thought that you needed Windows XP to run Office XP (Office 2002).

The official Microsoft press release announcing the Office 2007 branding and packaging brought me an exciting piece of news:

    “Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2007, the new name for a significantly updated release of Microsoft Office Professional Enterprise Edition 2003, will deliver improved information management and teamwork solutions through integration with new Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 capabilities, as well as inclusion of Microsoft Office Communicator.”

So it looks like soon I’ll finally be getting hold of Microsoft Office Communicator on my corporate desktop (assuming my employer adopts Office 2007) – that should open a world of communications possibilities for me.

Microsoft’s Open XML document formats

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

There has been a lot of media and industry comment of late about Office document formats, including Microsoft’s willingness (or otherwise) to embrace open standards. Whilst there will be some limited PDF support in the next version of Office (Office 12), Microsoft is hoping that it’s submission of the new Office formats to the ECMA will be sufficient to make the new Office file format a global standard.

In a newsletter sent to Windows Vista and Office 12 beta testers, Microsoft commented that:

“…Word, PowerPoint, and Excel documents are now zipped files containing separate XML components. This format has just been released to ECMA and can be used royalty free.”

They continued to extol the virtues of this approach, claiming that:

“This means that you can build robust server side processes that manipulate and create office documents without ever needing the client [applications] running on the server. The openness of the file format means that ISVs can access the full semantic content of their documents without relying on Microsoft code to extract strings.”

On the face of it, this sounds good, but my first impression is still “oh no, yet more explaining to customers why their users on previous Office versions can’t read documents that have been sent from Office 12 users”. Oh well, I guess that’s the price of progress, but isn’t .PDF a de facto standard for document interchange these days?

Scanning a multiple-page document into a single file using Microsoft Office

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

Last night, I discovered a Microsoft Office program that I’ve never used before – and it’s actually quite a useful feature to know about.

I’d received a contract in .PDF format which needed to be signed and returned by fax or e-mail. I no longer have a fax machine (my ISP provides me with a fax-to-email service for receiving faxes and I very rarely send them). So, my problem was that once I’d printed and signed the (multiple page) contract, how could I digitise it again (as a single document, rather than several individual pages)? The answer was Microsoft Office Document Imaging – provided as part of Office XP and 2003 (and possibly in other versions too – I haven’t checked). This let me scan multiple pages into a single .TIF file, also offering optical character recognition (OCR) and annotation functionality (pens, highlighting, text and picture insert, etc.).

I’ve been using Microsoft Office for many years, and I’ve never used this feature before – it strikes me that it might be a useful piece of information for someone else too.

Office 12 PDF support

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

I just read on Stuart Preston’s blog that Microsoft will support the portable document format (PDF) natively in Office 12. Unfortunately, this is a publish (one-way) operation so we’ll still need Adobe Reader (or another application capable of reading PDF-formatted documents).

Office 2003 SP2 and anti-phishing protection for Outlook 2003 released

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

Yesterday, Microsoft released Office 2003 Service Pack 2 (SP2).

SP2 is basically a rollup of fixes for Office (full technical details can be found in Microsoft knowledge base article 887616) but it also includes enhancements to Outlook 2003’s Junk E-mail Filter to provide protection against phishing attacks, automatically evaluating any incoming message to see if it might be suspicious, potentially fraudulent, and part of a phishing scheme. For added security, messages that are moved to the Junk E-mail folder will now have their links disabled and message format converted to Plain Text format (any message later moved out of the Junk E-mail folder will have its links enabled and the original message format restored, unless the message is considered by the Junk E-mail Filter to contain suspicious links in which case the links will remain disabled).

In the same manner as the Office 2003 Service Pack 1 release, along with the main service pack, equivalent service packs for OneNote 2003, Project 2003 and Visio 2003 were released.

Further details can be found at Microsoft Office Update.

Office Vista?

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

I just stumbled across a comment in one of Paul Thurrott’s Windows IT Pro magazine network WinInfo Daily Updates from a few weeks back that the next version of Microsoft Office (Office 12) might be called “Microsoft Office Vista”. If that does happen, I think it would be a really bad idea…

To put it simply, consumers (and business end-users) get confused about what software they use. That makes life harder for people like me. Whenever I start working with a new organisation I often am amazed to find how many names a single critical line-of-business application might be known by and I’ve lost count of the number of times people have tried to tell me that they use Windows 97 or Office 98 (I know that there was an Office 98 – but that was for the Macintosh).

The last time Microsoft released a version of Office which included part of the operating system name in its product name (Office XP), consumers (and senior IT management – the non-technical ones) got confused and thought that Office XP was somehow linked to Windows XP (as far as I’m aware there are no such constraints). Similarly, I understand that Office Vista will be supported on both Windows XP and Windows Vista so any Office product name including the Vista moniker could be confusing.

Personally I liked the old system of using numbers to describe products (the one that works well for the competition too) and think it should be the “Microsoft Office System, version 12” (well, version 11 really because I seem to recall that the version numbers jumped from 4.3 to 6 a few years back as part of a game of “version number catchup”, but that’s too long ago to bother about now…). What about calling Windows Vista “Microsoft Windows, version 6”?

The new interface for Office 12

This content is 19 years old. I don't routinely update old blog posts as they are only intended to represent a view at a particular point in time. Please be warned that the information here may be out of date.

Having just said that Microsoft needs to be better at innovating if it is to survive another 30 years in business, it seems that the next version of Microsoft Office has surprised everyone with a new, simplified user interface that removes much of the toolbar clutter. The press release includes screenshots for Office 12 core applications as well as a description of why Microsoft made the changes (there’s also a review of the interface on Office Watch).

I laughed when I read the comments about the new interface on Mark Harrison’s blog (which I was alerted to by Rory) – one which says “I hope [Microsoft] makes it easy for me to put things back the way I want” and another (from Mark) saying “[let’s] have a dinosaur button to revert… to [the] old UI”! Could this be another case where Microsoft are forced to provide a “classic” interface to please those who don’t want to move with the times? The press release indicates that there are no plans to do so at present that doesn’t mean things won’t change before the product is released and whilst I appreciate that from a user familiarity perspective, many organisations will be reluctant to change (as there will be an associated training cost), the current UI has evolved over many years and is far too complex.

Interestingly, Microsoft say that this only applies to their authoring applications – Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access and parts of Outlook. Traditional menus and toolbars will still be used in many areas of the Office suite.

I can’t wait to see what they do to Outlook.